*Click here for Part 2Part 3; or Part 4*

I picked up a used copy of Lesslie Newbigin’s 1981 book Sign of the Kingdom. To my delight, the last owner filled the pages with underlining, arrows, and comments like “Critical”, “Good point”, and—in one place—“Foils of Marxism”.

The book’s topic is incredibly relevant for today. In the forward, Newbigin notes three concerns which he believes the theme of the Kingdom will address:

  1. “Contemporary Christianity is subject to severe tensions between those on the one hand who see their faith as essentially concerned with the life of the spirit and regard the ‘politicization of Christianity’ as a grave deviation from the truth, and those on the other hand who regard a purely private and ‘spiritual’ religion as a betrayal of the Biblical revelation. … Can the study of this Biblical theme illuminate this contemporary struggle?” (page viii)
  2. “We live at a time when there is a strong insistence on ‘people’s participation’, on ‘power to the people’, on the right of everyone to be consulted when decisions are made which affect him; and when there is, on the other hand, a conservative swing in the direction of more authoritarian styles of leadership. … Can the study of kingship in the Bible help us to find the right kinds of leadership for our time?” (viii-ix)
  3. “One of the most important things happening in the world today is the world-wide renaissance of Islam. … Can we learn to meet Islam with more understanding if we reflect afresh on what the kingship of God means in our own scriptures?” (ix)

It’s hard to believe this is from 1981!

Reading the first point, my thoughts were drawn to the struggle between the growing number of Christians embracing a more Anabaptist-type attitude towards Christian engagement with the political system, vs those Christians who so align with a particular political party that they seem willing to support it no matter how anti-Christ the values espoused.

The second is equally easy to see today: under ‘people’s participation’ I think of the movement represented in the USA by Bernie Sanders and his supporters (myself included, as the good millennial that I am), vs again, the more authoritarian leadership we see on the Right (not just in the USA, of course).  From the response of some to the early appointments made by Trump, for example, its not hard to find the authoritarian longing attitude which says, “They’re billionaires, therefore they must know best. I’ll leave it to them”, ie: let the real grown-ups handle this.

On the third, of course, today we have the rise of ISIS and corresponding fear in the West, some even afraid of those fleeing the violence themselves!  But, thankfully, with increased welcome to refugees comes increased opportunities for us in the West to share the gospel with these (often Muslim) newcomers, and there, I think, is where we will benefit most from Newbigin’s insights.

Sign of the Kingdom has only three chapters: The Kingdom, “In Historical Perspective”; “In Biblical Perspective”; and “In Perspective of Today’s Mission”.

I am hoping to write my thoughts on each chapter as I work through it. However I can’t say how long it will take to post up each part, so please bear with me.

So with this, I welcome you to the book.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Book discussion: Lesslie Newbigin, Sign of the Kingdom (1981): Part 1

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s